![rssowl unable to connec rssowl unable to connec](https://www.easypcmod.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Malwarebytes-Unable-To-Connect.jpg)
I like the footer better with Sj's smaller shortcut links rather than the normal template visual balance is more important than consistency with other shortcuts. Depending on the contrast settings on the monitor I happen to be using, it may or may not even be visible, and even when visible it's probably a tossup whether you find it beneficial or distracting. ALoan (Talk) 10:54, (UTC) I think the color is a lot of extra markup for minimal reward. How about adding rather than Shortcut : WP:POST as proposed which unfortunately widens the section between the tramlines slightly. And I'd rather not start down a road that eventually leads to accumulating lots of junk on the page. I'm not objecting because it's an awful idea, but on balance I don't think it brings enough benefit to compensate for the negatives. It doesn't matter for most of the Wikipedia pages that use shortcuts because they're not as focused on visual layout. There's also the issue of allowing too much stuff to clutter up the page and undo the beneficial effect of whitespace. The template itself looks okay, but the image used for the title is no longer properly centered. Since you have objections, I won't add it, but you should have a look at it yourself. Also, I previewed the shortcut template on the main SP page ( Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost), and if you place it before the "Signpost" picture, it appears exactly to the right of it and looks good.
![rssowl unable to connec rssowl unable to connec](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IX-2cxYpKH0/XzlIjmvskPI/AAAAAAAABzg/wq-RFKkeJ2Ac3rx5IgdR4aV8ney-XxEtQCLcBGAsYHQ/s879/edge.jpg)
However, I would ask that no shortcut template be added to this page, as it would interfere with the visual presentation of the material. Either WP:WSP or WP:SIGN would be my choices, or both could be created. How about WP:SIGN? nine thirty- five 22:50, (UTC) If somebody wants to create a shortcut, that's fine.
![rssowl unable to connec rssowl unable to connec](https://25dollarsupport.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/v3.2.png)
Is there a special rule/procedere for shortcuts or can I just make one? Anyone opposing? - grm wnr 21:03, (UTC) Can it get a Shortcut? I think WP:WSP or WP:WPSP or even WP:WISP (I prefer the first one) would be appropriate, since WP:SP is already taken. I think the Signpost is eminently important. Sorry about the delay, my immediate priority was getting the new issue up, and the technical problems haven't been making this project terribly easy.
RSSOWL UNABLE TO CONNEC ARCHIVE
I've now organized the last issue into an archive at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives and linked it on the page. It is possible to use the history of course, but that's not very comfortable. It would be nice to have a direct link to older issues on the article-page. Michael Snow 17:05, (UTC) archive of older issues Stories will be rotated by moving all of the current stories to an archive when a new issue is published. Granted, the news items themselves happen at different times, but some happen over the course of days, so I'm not going to try and organize by which came first. The same date applies to all headlines, and the stories themselves are dated in the bylines, so chronology is less of an issue. In terms of the date, it's on the page itself below the logo, in the right-hand margin. ja:Wikipedia:大使館(now retired) and ja:Wikipedia:ウィキメディアニュース are basically organized in that way (though not using any subpage because reports are shorter). That would way, you do not have to think hard about which story to keep/remove, etc. give each item some key words or categories - "technical," "dispute resolution," "policies and guidelines," etc.Regarding the formt, I think it might be easier to maintain the page if you Hi, thank you for initiating this valuable project. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. This page is an archive of past discussions.